This page is about aches and joint discomfort that people suspect might be linked to something they eat. It covers what people commonly report, which foods get trialled most often, how to run a fair six-week elimination with a structured reintroduction — and, just as importantly, when joint symptoms are not a job for a diet experiment at all. Joint pain is the topic on this site where we are most cautious, because some of the conditions that cause it are serious, treatable, and get worse if they are ignored while somebody quietly gives up tomatoes for two months.
Please read this section before the rest of the page. Joint pain has a long list of possible causes and several of them are conditions where early assessment genuinely matters. A food screen has nothing useful to say about any of them.
Book an appointment with your GP — and do not spend six weeks on an elimination diet first — if any of the following apply:
None of that is a reason to panic; it is a reason to get looked at. Blood tests, imaging and a proper clinical examination can distinguish between causes that a food diary never will. If your GP has already assessed you and you are dealing with mild, grumbling, comes-and-goes aches with no red flags, then exploring diet is a reasonable thing to do alongside — never instead of — whatever your doctor has advised.
Aches wax and wane for reasons that have nothing to do with your dinner: how much you walked yesterday, how you slept, a cold coming on, a change in the weather, a new pair of shoes, a stressful week, or simply the natural cycle of whatever is going on in that joint. Many joint problems have naturally good spells and bad spells. If you remove a food during a bad spell, you will very often feel better a fortnight later — and the food had nothing to do with it. This is the single biggest reason people become convinced of a food link that does not hold up.
Where people do report a food link, it is usually described as delayed and vague rather than immediate and obvious: heavier, stiffer, more achy the day after a particular meal, rather than a sharp reaction within minutes. A delay of a day or more makes it almost impossible to identify the food by memory alone, because dozens of other things happened in between. That is exactly why a written diary and a one-food-at-a-time reintroduction matter far more here than in any other symptom on this site.
We would rather lose a sale than mislead you. There is no robust scientific evidence that screening a hair sample can identify which foods cause symptoms, and no evidence that it can tell you anything about your joints. Hair is largely non-living keratin. Independent testing of this style of screening has found poor repeatability. We are not going to dress that up.
What the screen is genuinely useful for is narrower and more practical: it turns an overwhelming, open-ended question — “could it be something I eat?” — into a short, ordered list of items worth exploring first. Elimination diets fail far more often from being too broad and too vague than from picking the wrong starting food. A shortlist gives you a manageable experiment you can actually finish, and the experiment is the thing that produces the answer. If you want the best-evidenced route instead, ask your GP for a referral to a registered dietitian, who can supervise an elimination properly.
The list below is what people most often mention and most often try removing. It is not a list of foods that cause joint pain, and being on it does not mean a food is a problem for you. Treat it as the folklore and the starting points, not as findings.
Tomatoes, potatoes, peppers, chillies and aubergine are the classic self-experiment for aching joints. The idea circulates widely; the evidence for it is thin. Some people are convinced their aches settle without them, and the only honest way to find out whether you are one of them is to remove the whole group cleanly for six weeks and then bring them back one at a time. Watch for hidden sources: paprika and cayenne appear in a huge range of spice blends, and tomato turns up in sauces, soups and ready meals.
Bread, pasta, cereals, barley, rye and a long tail of sauces, stock cubes and processed foods. If you are going to trial gluten, one thing must come first: coeliac disease is diagnosed by your GP through blood tests and sometimes a biopsy, and those tests only work while you are still eating gluten. Our screen does not test for coeliac disease and cannot exclude it. Cutting gluten out before being tested can make a coeliac diagnosis harder to reach, so speak to your GP before you remove it.
Milk, cheese, cream, butter and yoghurt, plus the milk proteins hidden in baked goods, sauces and processed foods. Dairy is one of the most commonly trialled groups for almost every symptom, which is partly a reflection of how much of it most UK diets contain. If you remove it, take calcium into account — a dietitian or your GP can advise on that.
Frequently reported, and worth trialling for a straightforward reason: it is one of the few things on this list where people often notice a next-day difference. Bear in mind alcohol affects sleep, hydration and activity too, so a change after removing it does not necessarily point to anything food-specific. Alcohol also interacts with many medicines — if you take anything regularly, that is a conversation with your pharmacist or GP.
Red meat, offal, some shellfish, and beer are the foods usually named in discussions of purines. We need to be careful here. Purine intake is discussed in relation to gout, which is a medical condition diagnosed and managed by a doctor, usually with a blood test and treatment that has nothing to do with a hair screen. Our screen does not test for gout, does not measure uric acid, and nothing on this page is guidance on managing it. If you have had a sudden, severely painful, hot and swollen joint — often a big toe, though not always — that is a same-week GP appointment, not a diet trial.
Some people trial a general reduction in ultra-processed food rather than a single ingredient. It is a reasonable thing to try but a poor experiment: you change dozens of variables at once, usually eat more vegetables, often lose a little weight and frequently drink less alcohol, so if you feel better you will have no idea why. If you want an answer rather than a general improvement, change one thing at a time. The Platinum panel at £65 additionally covers preservatives, E-numbers and vitamin and mineral markers if that is the direction you want to explore.
These questions are for people whose GP has already looked at their symptoms and found nothing needing treatment, and whose aches are mild and intermittent.
If you answered no to the first question, start there. If you answered no to the fifth, the screen will not help you much — the diary is where the information comes from.
The plan below is also what the 90-day money-back guarantee asks of you: six weeks of following your plan, with a food diary. To be plain about it, the guarantee is a promise about your money, not a promise about your joints.
| Silver | £37 — top 100 items |
| Gold | £49 — 700+ items (350 foods and drinks + 350 non-food) |
| Platinum | £65 — Gold items plus preservatives, E-numbers and vitamin and mineral markers |
| Couples | £74 |
| Family | £125 |
| Personalised meal plan | £10 add-on |
Suitable from age 6. Reports are available for six months; transaction records are retained separately under the privacy policy. We have been trading since 2017 and are rated 4.0/5 on Google.
No, and it is important to be blunt about this. The screen does not test for arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, gout or any other condition, and a report full of green results does not mean your joints are healthy. Only a doctor can assess joint disease, using examination, blood tests and imaging. If that is the question you want answered, please book a GP appointment rather than a screen.
We cannot tell you that it will, and there is no good evidence that it does as a general rule. What we can say is that it is one of the most commonly self-trialled changes for aching joints, and that the only way to know whether it makes any difference for you specifically is to run a clean six-week removal followed by a proper reintroduction, with a written diary. Plenty of people run that trial and find no difference at all — which is a genuinely useful thing to learn, because it stops you restricting your diet for no reason.
It might be a food pattern, or it might be several other things travelling together: alcohol, a later night, less sleep, more salt, more sitting, and a bigger portion than usual. That is precisely why one-food-at-a-time reintroduction exists. Change one variable, keep the rest constant, and see whether it repeats. If it only ever happens on evenings out and never when you eat the same food at home, the food is probably not the explanation.
It has no proven accuracy. There is no robust scientific evidence that hair analysis identifies food intolerance, and repeat testing of the same sample does not reliably produce the same result. We publish that plainly because it is true and because you deserve to decide with it in front of you. What the report gives you is a starting shortlist rather than an answer, and everything you learn comes from the elimination and reintroduction you run afterwards.
No. Never stop or change prescribed medication because of anything in a screening report or on this page. If a report flags something you take, or you are wondering whether a medicine is relevant to how you feel, that is a conversation with your GP or pharmacist. Also tell them if you plan to remove a major food group for six weeks, particularly if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, managing a long-term condition, or the plan is for a child.
Order, then follow the emailed instructions to snip 9 or 10 strands of hair and post them yourself — there is no kit to wait for. Your report is emailed within 3 working days of the sample reaching our UK lab, so allow roughly 5–7 days from posting. After that, the elimination itself is the long part: a baseline week, six weeks of removal, then several more weeks of reintroducing foods one at a time. Realistically you are looking at three months before you have a confident picture. Anyone promising you a faster answer about joints is not being straight with you.
When to speak to your GP. Please make a GP appointment — and do not run a diet trial first — if you have a joint that is swollen, hot, red or unusually tender; morning stiffness lasting more than about 30 minutes; joint pain that has lasted several weeks, is getting worse, or wakes you at night; pain in several joints at once, particularly on both sides of the body; joint symptoms together with fever, rash, unexplained weight loss or severe fatigue; a joint that locks, gives way or cannot bear weight; or any joint symptoms in a child. Seek urgent medical help for a single hot, swollen, severely painful joint, especially with a fever. Our screen does not test for and cannot rule out arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, gout, lupus or coeliac disease — only a doctor can assess those, and delaying assessment can matter. Please also speak to your GP or a registered dietitian before removing a major food group for several weeks, and never change prescribed medication on the basis of a screening report.